Who agrees with the following statement: CANCER IS MOTHER NATURE'S FORM OF POPULATION CONTROL.?

I just thought of this a while ago;


people are breeding like rodents and need something to slow them down before we run out of Earth.Who agrees with the following statement: CANCER IS MOTHER NATURE'S FORM OF POPULATION CONTROL.?
I agree. Actually people are cancer to the planet earth. We are the bad cells that keep multiplying.Who agrees with the following statement: CANCER IS MOTHER NATURE'S FORM OF POPULATION CONTROL.?
I don't think so.


There are millions of other things that are keeping the population under control; not just cancer, albeit it is one of the biggest things.





Although cancer can and sometimes is just something that happens to people without a reason, you can't deny that we humans are killing ourselves with cancer. There is so much carcinogenic pollution and unnecessary ingredients in food and who knows what else, that is causing cancer [among other diseases], so that isn't mother nature, it's us.
I think that's pretty harsh. People breed like people. We do have too many people on earth and it's time we stopped following that Biblical directive to ';be fertile and multiply.'; We done multiplied! We're plentiful enough. But cancer is not the answer. In fact, scientists are well aware that it's our own pollutants in many cases that are causing such high rates of cancer -- cigarettes, chemical additives in food, run-off from factories, chemicals in clothing, chemicals from spray cans that have gotten into the atmosphere, air pollution in general, pollutants in the water, all kinds of pollution is poisoning us. These pollutants are killing off all the frogs and toads and salamanders world-wide, many of the insects and birds, and many other animals and plants all over the world, not just people. Tasmanian Devils, a type of marsupial in Australia, are nearly extinct now from a formerly rare cancer too. That's our fault as well. No, it's not nature. It's us.
Cancer has nothing to do with population control. It's not up to Mother Nature to handle population control either.





Population control is up to us. Having sex with no form of birth control is the main target for over population. It's also the lack of education in many other countries. They don't know about birth control. They're living their lives like they always have done for 100's of years. Too many children, not enough food. They have to be taught about the resources they have in order to survive and that's a slow process. Not enough qualified people (Peace Corp., etc.) to teach other countries hose to survive. Changes in cultural habits is a difficult task, if it can be done at all.





The U.S. has there own problems as well. There may be sex education in our schools, but are our young people actually practicing save sex and not contributing to the population. This of course doesn't me only young people. It includes all of us. The only ones who can control over population is us. A moment of pleasure (unprotected) leads to another mouth to feed and a lot of money to feed and cloth a child. We simply have to think before we do.
not only that but wars,famine,infectious disease all play a part in population control its said that for every person that dies theirs 5 babies being born, mostly from poor 3rd world countries, especially India and China they are breeding like rats over their
Who agrees with the following statement?





If it weren't for President Bush, and the GOP's policy towards stem cell research, we just might have a cure for Cancer by now!!
Most people have already reproduced by the time they get cancer, mother nature is fond of a nice pandemic though.
I was going to ask that question. Now its answered. I will be able to sleep tonight.
You're a genius. Now furnish some scientific proof for your hypothesis.